Skip to main content

Cookie settings

We use cookies to ensure the basic functionalities of the website and to enhance your online experience. You can configure and accept the use of the cookies, and modify your consent options, at any time.

Essential

Preferences

Analytics and statistics

Close debate

What is the summary or conclusion of this debate?

Deciding NoVASEN Membership Criteria

Avatar: Sahnun Mohamud Sahnun Mohamud

We began our discussion in-person on 3/27/26 and are using this to extend our discussion. Decisions we need input on and ideally reasoning for or against a position are below: (1) Criteria to be a new member. (2) Criteria to determine voting vs. non-voting members. (3) Onboarding process for new members (interview? new member presentations?) Contradictions/Tradeoffs discussed in-person included: Related to (1) Balancing a welcoming atmosphere and desire to grow with member safety Related to (2) Our decision-making thus far has been very informal - do we keep it that way for now or do we start having voting portions of meetings or use Decidim as a means of collecting votes in-between meetings. Related to (3) Formal interview seems like a-lot, however, first-meeting introduction could be a decision point for whether we're comfortable with someone. Strive to be welcoming and non-judgemental as possible.
Comment

Confirm

Please log in

The password is too short.

Share